Different starting materials

In the published profile, PINHONBIO® TECA combines asiaticoside with asiatic acid and madecassic acid. Madecassoside is a named constituent with its own selected assay grade. Those descriptions represent different material identities and should remain distinct in a comparison.

What a comparison can establish

A side-by-side record helps explain what each material is and what its assay controls. It cannot establish a relative efficacy ranking without an appropriate study.

QuestionTECA profileMadecassoside grade
What is the material?A specified multi-constituent profileA named constituent
What must the assay identify?Included constituents and fraction definitionsThe named constituent and selected grade
What should be aligned?Method, result basis and batch evidenceMethod, result basis and batch evidence
What remains a formula question?Incorporation, stability and performanceIncorporation, stability and performance

Keep similar names separate

Madecassoside and madecassic acid refer to different substances. A composition declaration naming one should not be read as declaring the other. When a material is changed, review the full identity and analytical dossier rather than matching only the plant source.

Avoid a percentage-only substitution

Do not assume that a headline extract percentage gives an equivalent dose of a particular constituent. Establish the concentration of the constituent that matters to the study using a compatible analytical basis, then assess the complete formula.

Write a traceable selection note

A selection note should identify the proposed function, chosen material, accepted specification, incorporation approach and evidence for the finished formula. The result is a decision that another formulator can understand and reproduce, rather than a general statement that one Centella ingredient is better.

Sources & scope

Supplier material reviewed October 1, 2026. General evaluation recommendations are editorial perspectives, not reported PINHONBIO test results.